Please review the portion of the livestream recording of the Dec. 14, 2021 board meeting, beginning at 4:43:40, where Trustee LaShonda McFadden said she has been ex-communicated from speaking to Superintendent Baron Davis and spoke about being placed under some type of order of confidentiality. We should be greatly concerned about that. Does the superintendent need his hands slapped for attempting to silence a trustee?
Following her comments, Trustee McFadden moved to amend board agenda policy BEBD so that the Superintendent and board chair are not the only ones who can have items put on the agenda. General, if Trustees Lindsay Agostini, LaShonda McFadden or Monica Scott ask to have an item placed on the agenda for discussion, the other four trustees will vote against them.
When viewing this section of the board meeting on You Tube, observe closely how the motion was handled by Chairman Teresa Holmes. When the vote to amend policy BEBD was called for, the she called for a hand-vote, instead of the electronic vote where votes are secret until they all appear at the same time on the overhead screen for all to see. When she asked for those in favor to raise their hands, Manning raised his hand, then quickly lowered it.
Trustees Agostini, Scott and McFadden voted in favor. Manning, Caution-Parker, McKie and Holmes voted against.
Not to put too fine a point on Roberts Rules, but at that point, the chair should have announced the vote as 3-4. She did not per Robert’s Rules of Order §4:43. Instead, she merely declared “Motion failed.”
My question to the four trustees who voted against Trustee McFadden’s motion is why do the core four just stick together and routinely vote against any motion by McFadden, Scott or Agostini? The four seem not to be able to think independently and act on what is correct for the board?
A board member should not have to fight to get an item on the agenda. A board member shouldn’t be subject to the whim of the chair or superintendent. By voting down a motion to consider an item, the core four eliminate valuable discussion. The place for that discussion is as a board agenda item.
In the scheduling a meeting to set an agenda, the chair should be representing the entire board. That might possibly require her to oppose the superintendent at some point, if she performs her elected role as chair responsibly.
Furthermore, when Trustee McFadden departed prior to the end of the meeting, the chair should have observed that and announced it, stating that quorum still existed and that the meeting would continue. (At a previous meeting, the chair announced late in the long meeting that a board member had left at 7 p.m., when she actually had departed at 8:30 p.m.)
The Voice of Blythewood has abdicated “journalism” and is now the voice of “cabals” and “coteries” to engage in political propaganda against Richland District Two Board of Trustees and its Superintendent, subsequently, all of the excellent deputies, staff, teachers, and children in the District.
It is a minority group of disrupters, likened unto what we are seeing in the body politic, that continues its attempts, mostly futile, to undermine the achievements and successes in the District Two.
What is unconscionable is that The Voice would be complicit in contributing to misinformation that the public can see is only a group whose behaviors are both disturbed and disturbing. The majority of residents and others watching and reading see the repeat “actors” and their unseemly actions.
Let’s be clear that the majority of citizens in Richland County believe that despite iniquitous inclinations, there is something in our minds that recognize what is fundamentally right and something in our hearts that is deeply moving by undaunted decency.
This continued indecency of these cabals and coteries is duly noted. It is just unfortunate that The Voice of Blythewood has renounced its moral and ethical responsibility as The Voice of Blythewood.